<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2.0 release dated</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html</link>
	<description>A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 06:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sergei</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-18936</link>
		<dc:creator>sergei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-18936</guid>
		<description>apt-get package management, you know there _should_ be good package management (for binary distribution and updatetion) like in Debian GNU/Linux to ease life for people who maintain production servers with DragonFly BSD OS on board</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>apt-get package management, you know there _should_ be good package management (for binary distribution and updatetion) like in Debian GNU/Linux to ease life for people who maintain production servers with DragonFly BSD OS on board</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sander</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-18278</link>
		<dc:creator>sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-18278</guid>
		<description>Not so much something I want in the release, but something I&#039;d like in the iso: the full source of the release. This would avoid having to download it separately, and would be nice for archival purposes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not so much something I want in the release, but something I&#8217;d like in the iso: the full source of the release. This would avoid having to download it separately, and would be nice for archival purposes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DpL Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DragonflyBSD 2.0 muy cerca</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-18017</link>
		<dc:creator>DpL Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DragonflyBSD 2.0 muy cerca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 23:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-18017</guid>
		<description>[...] Se espera que el prÃ³ximo dÃ­a 9 de Febrero se extraiga la rama 2.0 de DragonflyBSD current y para finales de este mismo mes ya esperan poder hacer el lanzamiento final. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Se espera que el prÃ³ximo dÃ­a 9 de Febrero se extraiga la rama 2.0 de DragonflyBSD current y para finales de este mismo mes ya esperan poder hacer el lanzamiento final. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe "Floid" Kanowitz</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-17964</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe "Floid" Kanowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-17964</guid>
		<description>@ teliti:  I was one of the lead groaners about the SB600, and (with great thanks to Thomas Spanjaard, and anyone else I might be forgetting) as of sometime in October 2007 it&#039;s working fully in AHCI mode, with the legacy PATA side also supported.  Note that, for determinism, this means your BIOS should have the controller set to AHCI mode.

Right now I&#039;m still running 1.11.0 (&quot;-DEVELOPMENT&quot;) from 7-Dec-2007 with no problems.  (In fact, my HD is still on the PATA side, with a SATA optical on a SATA port.)  If there&#039;s been a regression, let someone know before I shoot myself in the foot upgrading!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ teliti:  I was one of the lead groaners about the SB600, and (with great thanks to Thomas Spanjaard, and anyone else I might be forgetting) as of sometime in October 2007 it&#8217;s working fully in AHCI mode, with the legacy PATA side also supported.  Note that, for determinism, this means your BIOS should have the controller set to AHCI mode.</p>
<p>Right now I&#8217;m still running 1.11.0 (&#8220;-DEVELOPMENT&#8221;) from 7-Dec-2007 with no problems.  (In fact, my HD is still on the PATA side, with a SATA optical on a SATA port.)  If there&#8217;s been a regression, let someone know before I shoot myself in the foot upgrading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-17938</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-17938</guid>
		<description>Teliti - I don&#039;t know about support for that chipset; for all I know, it&#039;s already there.  Ask on the dragonfly-users@ mailing list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teliti &#8211; I don&#8217;t know about support for that chipset; for all I know, it&#8217;s already there.  Ask on the dragonfly-users@ mailing list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannes</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-17932</link>
		<dc:creator>hannes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-17932</guid>
		<description>Hi!
I read that updated DRM and DRI-Support will be included ( http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2008-01/msg00003.html ).

Is that the case?
Would be awesome ( I have been thinking about installing DfBSD for some time now, that would tip the balance! ).

If yes you should definitely mention it in the changelog!!!

Greetings &amp; Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!<br />
I read that updated DRM and DRI-Support will be included ( <a href="http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2008-01/msg00003.html" rel="nofollow">http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2008-01/msg00003.html</a> ).</p>
<p>Is that the case?<br />
Would be awesome ( I have been thinking about installing DfBSD for some time now, that would tip the balance! ).</p>
<p>If yes you should definitely mention it in the changelog!!!</p>
<p>Greetings &amp; Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DragonflyBSD 2.0 muy cerca at Tod-OS.com :: Te ponemos al dia</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-17929</link>
		<dc:creator>DragonflyBSD 2.0 muy cerca at Tod-OS.com :: Te ponemos al dia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 22:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-17929</guid>
		<description>[...] 2.0 muy cerca  Published by xender February 6th, 2008 in DragonFly     Se espera que el próximo día 9 de Febrero se extraiga la rama 2.0 de DragonflyBSD current y para finales de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2.0 muy cerca  Published by xender February 6th, 2008 in DragonFly     Se espera que el próximo día 9 de Febrero se extraiga la rama 2.0 de DragonflyBSD current y para finales de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teliti</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-17887</link>
		<dc:creator>teliti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 16:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-17887</guid>
		<description>Hey Cool!

Would it be possible to include support for ATI IXP 600 (SATA)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Cool!</p>
<p>Would it be possible to include support for ATI IXP 600 (SATA)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2008/02/04/2651.html/comment-page-1#comment-17877</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:17:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2008/02/04/2651.html#comment-17877</guid>
		<description>flux capacitor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flux capacitor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
