http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2007/11/03/2504.html A running description of activity related to DragonFly BSD. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:00:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2007/11/03/2504.html/comment-page-1#comment-15540 Captain Sonic Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:07:38 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/11/03/2504.html#comment-15540 Obviously there are many differences between the two, there isn't a "best firewall", it all depends from what you need. You can find a little but interesting overview here: http://cipitunk.wordpress.com/2007/07/07/ipfw-vs-pf/ Obviously there are many differences between the two, there isn’t a “best firewall”, it all depends from what you need.
You can find a little but interesting overview here:
http://cipitunk.wordpress.com/2007/07/07/ipfw-vs-pf/

]]> http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2007/11/03/2504.html/comment-page-1#comment-15529 justin Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:35:04 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/11/03/2504.html#comment-15529 IPFW2 offers some features that pf does not, like (I think) dummynet. Also, having IPFW2 in the system doesn't keep you from using PF. IPFW2 offers some features that pf does not, like (I think) dummynet. Also, having IPFW2 in the system doesn’t keep you from using PF.

]]> http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2007/11/03/2504.html/comment-page-1#comment-15525 Anonymous Sat, 03 Nov 2007 18:24:17 +0000 http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/index.php/2007/11/03/2504.html#comment-15525 What I don't get is why ipfw2 wasn't removed too, pf is the sexy firewall these days. What I don’t get is why ipfw2 wasn’t removed too, pf is the sexy firewall these days.

]]>